Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1/24/2012

State v. Payne

Citations

34 A.3d 370
303 Conn. 538
2012 WL 119864
2012 Conn. LEXIS 15

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

adopting new approach to joinder of criminal trials under rules of practice and noting that it will not apply retroactively on collateral review
overruling State v. King, 187 Conn. 292, 445 A.2d 901 [1982], ‘‘and its progeny,’’ and overruling in part State v. Tomas D., 296 Conn. 476, 995 A.2d 583 [2010]
defendant’s due process rights were not violated when prosecutor’s statements were isolated and occurred within lengthy closing argument
defendant’s due process rights not violated when prosecutor’s improper remarks were brief and confined to closing argument
‘‘[w]hen an error is not of constitutional magnitude, the defendant bears the burden of demonstrating that the error was harmful’’
trial court cured any harm by instructing jury that arguments of counsel were not evidence on which jurors could rely

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rogers, Palmer, Zarella, McLachlan, Eveleigh, Harper, Vertefeuiue

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

102 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.