Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2/7/2017
State v. Ayala
Citations
- 153 A.3d 588
- 324 Conn. 571
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that charging document may be amended to charge “an additional or different offense” provided amendment does not impair defendant’s ability to prepare for trial or present defense
- noting that when defendant’s constitutional right to notice is violated, state must prove constitutional error is harmless beyond reasonable doubt
- ‘‘when certain improprie- ties are of constitutional dimension, the burden falls on the state to establish that the impropriety was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt’’
- ‘‘[i]ndeed, the failure to exercise discretion is an abuse in and of itself’’
- ‘‘the failure to exercise discretion is an abuse in and of itself’’
- ‘‘[i]ndeed, the failure to exercise discretion is an abuse in and of itself’’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rogers, Palmer, Eveleigh, McDonald, Espinosa, Robinson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Borelli v. RenaldiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2020-06-24· cited 24×
- State v. Ruiz-PachecoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2020-07-09· cited 18×
- Kelsey v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court· 2020-12-22· cited 16×
- State v. HurdleSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2024-12-10· cited 10×
- State v. CushardSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2018-04-17· cited 9×
- State v. Morel-VargasSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2022-05-10· cited 8×
- State v. GreeneConnecticut Appellate Court· 2018-12-11· cited 4×
- State v. PelusoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2022-08-18· cited 4×
- State v. Joseph V.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2022-12-13· cited 2×
- In re Amias I.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2022-06-29· cited 2×
- State v. PelusoConnecticut Appellate Court· 2019-01-29· cited 1×
- State v. SinchakConnecticut Appellate Court· 2021-06-22· cited 1×
- State v. OrrConnecticut Appellate Court· 2020-08-04
- Borelli v. RenaldiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2021-02-16
- Davis v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2025-09-03
Cites
56 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 6,060×
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1999-06-10· cited 5,157×
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1997-05-12· cited 4,572×
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 3,675×
- Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court· 1986-07-02· cited 2,431×
- Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court· 1987-06-22· cited 2,329×
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-01-11· cited 2,073×
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-05-21· cited 1,715×
- Brooks v. TennesseeSupreme Court· 1972-06-07· cited 601×
- Ferguson v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1961-03-27· cited 363×
- State v. MorrillSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-09-10· cited 146×
- State v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2012-01-24· cited 144×
- State v. TweedySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-07-16· cited 109×
- State v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-09-28· cited 92×
- State v. FrankoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-04-22· cited 91×
- State v. CohaneSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-06-26· cited 88×
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-08-12· cited 86×
- State v. BerginSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-04-24· cited 83×
- State v. PareSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-07-11· cited 71×
- State v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-07-01· cited 70×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.