Supreme Court of Connecticut· 4/10/2007

State v. Fauci

Citations

917 A.2d 978
282 Conn. 23
2007 Conn. LEXIS 148

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that, in certified appeals, appellants must raise their claims ‘‘before the Appellate Court or in the petition for certification to appeal’’
concluding that state’s case was strong on basis of witness testimony despite lack of physical evidence linking defendant to crime
concluding that state’s case was strong on basis of witness testimony despite lack of physical evidence linking defendant to crime
noting that, in determining severity of prosecutorial impropriety, court will ‘‘look to whether the impropriety was blatantly egregious or inexcusable’’
in certified appeal, \[w]e ordinarily decline to consider claims that [were] not raised properly before the Appellate Court\
‘‘[w]e ordinarily decline to consider claims that are not raised properly before the Appellate Court or in the petition for certification to appeal to this court’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Borden, Katz, Palmer, Vertefeuille, Zarella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

122 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

57 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Fauci

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.