State v. Fauci

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that, in certified appeals, appellants must raise their claims ‘‘before the Appellate Court or in the petition for certification to appeal’’
• concluding that state’s case was strong on basis of witness testimony despite lack of physical evidence linking defendant to crime
• concluding that state’s case was strong on basis of witness testimony despite lack of physical evidence linking defendant to crime
• noting that, in determining severity of prosecutorial impropriety, court will ‘‘look to whether the impropriety was blatantly egregious or inexcusable’’
• in certified appeal, \[w]e ordinarily decline to consider claims that [were] not raised properly before the Appellate Court\
• ‘‘[w]e ordinarily decline to consider claims that are not raised properly before the Appellate Court or in the petition for certification to appeal to this court’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).