Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1/26/2018

State v. Campbell

Citations

180 A.3d 882
328 Conn. 444

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that establishing means for committing crime is appropriate alternative purpose for which prior mis- conduct evidence may be admissible
reviewing court must determine whether trial court's denial of continuance request was arbitrary or unreasonable
shooting at home where defen- dant believed victim to be staying less vicious than shooting three victims in head at close range
declining to consider whether to adopt the “cumulative error” doctrine because, as in Hinds, the errors claimed would not satisfy that doctrine
dismissing penalty phase challenge in death penalty appeal as rendered moot by abolition of death penalty and unripe by virtue of fact that defendant had not yet been resentenced
‘‘prejudicial impact of uncharged misconduct evidence is assessed in light of its relative ‘viciousness’ in comparison with the charged conduct’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Espinosa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

65 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.