Skip to main content

State v. Weatherspoon

Citations

  • 212 A.3d 208
  • 332 Conn. 531

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deciding it was unnecessary to consider defendant’s request for exercise of supervisory authority because prosecutor’s tailoring argument was specific rather than generic
  • declining to establish rule when no such injustice occurred in case
  • defense coun- sel’s failure to object to allegedly improper comments is ‘‘a strong indication that they did not carry substantial weight in the course of the trial as a whole and were not so egregious that they caused the defendant harm’’
  • ‘‘[w]hile the privilege of coun- sel in addressing the jury should not be too closely narrowed or unduly hampered, it must never be used as a license to state, or to comment [on], or to suggest an inference from, facts not in evidence’’ (internal quo- tation marks omitted)
  • providing example of specific tailoring

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robinson, Palmer, McDonald, D'Auria, Mullins, Kahn, Ecker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.