Supreme Court of Connecticut· 6/1/1982
State v. King
Citations
- 187 Conn. 292
- 445 A.2d 901
- 1982 Conn. LEXIS 525
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that rule of practice permissibly expanded circumstances in which joinder could be proper because it regulates court procedure and does not infringe on any substantive right
- “obvious example of possible prejudice” in the consolidation of cases is that “jury will use the evidence of one crime to convict the defendant of the other [crime]”
- reports of toxicological tests admissible although witnesses performing tests did not testify and no narcotics were left after testing; court noted defen dant could have subpoenaed chemists if she had any doubts about the tests' reliability
- evidence offered for charges of burglary in the third degree and larceny in the third degree in one information and of possession of heroin and cocaine in a separate information are “simple, separable and straightforward”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Speziale, Peters, Healey, Parskey, Armentano
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
72 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. DeJesusSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-08-19· cited 196×
- State v. BoscarinoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-08-11· cited 186×
- State v. WaltonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-08-03· cited 157×
- State v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2012-01-24· cited 144×
- Virgo v. LyonsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-12-27· cited 134×
- State v. JarzbekSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-08-11· cited 129×
- State v. RodgersSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-12-17· cited 113×
- State v. HerringSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-02-14· cited 111×
- State v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-01-23· cited 109×
- State v. PollittSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-08-25· cited 108×
- State v. JenningsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-12-11· cited 100×
- In re Samantha C.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-04-27· cited 96×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-07-18· cited 85×
- State v. GreeneSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-12-27· cited 77×
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-03-16· cited 76×
- State v. RawlsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-12-17· cited 75×
- State v. ChanceSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-02-13· cited 71×
- State v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-07-27· cited 66×
- Fattibene v. KealeyConnecticut Appellate Court· 1989-05-16· cited 64×
- State v. VessichioSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-11-26· cited 61×
Cites
71 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
- California v. GreenSupreme Court· 1970-06-23· cited 3,363×
- Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court· 1970-12-15· cited 1,926×
- Barber v. PageSupreme Court· 1968-04-29· cited 1,846×
- Spencer v. TexasSupreme Court· 1966-11-21· cited 1,416×
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1973-06-05· cited 917×
- Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1964-02-13· cited 860×
- Mancusi v. StubbsSupreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 704×
- People v. ShapiroNew York Court of Appeals· 1980-07-03· cited 410×
- Motes v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1900-05-28· cited 321×
- Robert G. Baker v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1968-08-09· cited 276×
- State v. RobertsOhio Supreme Court· 1980-05-14· cited 266×
- United States v. John L. MorrowFifth Circuit· 1976-08-16· cited 233×
- United States v. Louis WernerSecond Circuit· 1980-02-28· cited 193×
- Commonwealth v. PetersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-07-02· cited 168×
- State v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-04-29· cited 156×
- United States v. LotschSecond Circuit· 1939-02-27· cited 134×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1975-12-09· cited 134×
- United States v. Pembrick Edward Foutz, Jr.Fourth Circuit· 1976-08-16· cited 127×
- Ernest Kay v. United StatesFourth Circuit· 1958-05-17· cited 126×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.