State v. Ortiz
Citations
- 343 Conn. 566
Syllabus
Convicted of the crime of murder in connection with the shooting death of the victim, the defendant appealed to this court, claiming, inter alia, that he was deprived of his due process right to a fair trial as a result of prosecutorial impropriety during the state's rebuttal argument. The 343 Conn. 566 JUNE, 2022 567 State v. Ortiz victim and his friend, L, who had been using phencyclidine (PCP), drove to an area in Hartford to purchase more PCP. After L parked the car, the victim exited the car while L remained in the car, and the victim approached the defendant. The victim and the defendant engaged in discussion concerning drugs, after which the victim returned to the car. The defendant then approached the car, aimed a gun at the victim, and shot the victim through the front passenger window. L and two other individuals, I and R, the latter of whom was spending time and smoking PCP with the defendant at and around the time of the shooting, witnessed the events as they unfolded. L, I, and R each identified the defendant in a photographic array as the perpetrator. R thereafter provided a written statement to investigators and testimony to a grand jury implicat- ing the defendant in the murder. Prior to the defendant's trial, however, R indicated to defense counsel that she wanted to recant both her written statement and grand jury testimony. The state subsequently discovered that the defendant had sent text messages to R while he was incarcerated in an attempt to influence her testimony. Insofar as this evidence could have demonstrated the defendant's consciousness of guilt, both defense counsel and the state entered into an agreement pursuant to which the prosecutor, on direct examination of R, would question her about whom she was with and what she saw on the night of the murder but would not question her about her communications with the defendant while he was incarcerated. Pursuant further to that agreement, defense counsel would limit his cross-examination of
Judges: Robinson; McDonald; D’Auria; Mullins; Kahn; Ecker; Keller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. Juan J.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2022-07-05· cited 20×
- State v. Juan A. G.-P.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2023-02-06· cited 13×
- State v. HonschSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2024-07-19· cited 13×
- State v. Adam P.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-02-11· cited 11×
- State v. HindsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2022-08-30· cited 10×
- State v. CalhounSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2023-03-07· cited 7×
- State v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-05-20· cited 6×
- State v. BemberSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2024-06-25· cited 4×
- State v. MebaneSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2024-08-20
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-07-28· cited 498×
- State v. WaltonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-08-03· cited 157×
- State v. SkakelSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-01-24· cited 153×
- State v. PinnockSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-01-14· cited 150×
- State v. WarholicSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-05-30· cited 150×
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-10-28· cited 147×
- State v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2012-01-24· cited 144×
- State v. CeballosSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-10-21· cited 125×
- State v. DenbySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-12-05· cited 123×
- State v. GrahamSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-05-27· cited 121×
- State v. NardiniSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-07-13· cited 114×
- State v. NewsomeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-08-06· cited 111×
- State v. GeyerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-07-24· cited 103×
- State v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-09-28· cited 92×
- State v. BergerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-06-01· cited 82×
- State v. FalconeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-08-09· cited 81×
- Label Systems Corp. v. Samad AghamohammadiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-07-27· cited 70×
- State v. ANGEL T.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-06-30· cited 67×
- State v. CollinsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-01-05· cited 62×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.