State v. Pandeli

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding defendant invited evidentiary error when defense counsel explicitly informed the trial court that he did not object to the admission of evidence in question
• explaining that Due Process Clause prohibits unbounded and limitless rebuttal evidence
• declining to consider an alleged error in the admission of evidence where the defendant “explicitly stated that he did not” object to its admissibility
• affording good inmate evidence little weight “because prisoners are expected to behave”
• allowing any evidence demonstrating the defendant should not be shown leniency

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).