State v. Bocharski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[a]bsent any finding of [error], there can be no cumulative effect”
• holding Confrontation Clause and hearsay rule violations are subject to harmless error analysis, and any such error was harmless because the objected-to testimony was “superfluous” to other witnesses’ testimony to the same effect
• finding weight of defendant’s alcohol impairment weakened by his “purposeful steps to avoid prosecution”
• analyzing evidence admitted in violation of the Confrontation Clause for harmless error
• “Absent any finding of misconduct, there can be no cumulative effect of misconduct sufficient to permeate the entire atmosphere of the trial with unfairness.”
• “Absent any finding of misconduct, there can be no cumulative effect of misconduct sufficient to permeate the entire atmosphere of the trial with unfairness.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).