Arizona Supreme Court· 8/9/2004

State v. Moody

Citations

94 P.3d 1119
208 Ariz. 424

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

refusing to consider arguments raised in opening brief that failed to comply with ARCAP requirements
explaining opening briefs that fail to present significant arguments supported by authority usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that argument
explaining that “[mjerely mentioning an argument is not enough”
failure to present significant arguments supported by authority in an opening brief waives the issue
“[O]n appeal we will review the indictment only to determine whether it was based on perjured, material testimony.”
“Failure to object to a comment in closing argument waives that argument on appeal, and we therefore review it only for fundamental error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Berch, McGregor, Ryan, Weisberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

148 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

146 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.