State of Arizona v. Edward James Rose

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding victim impact statement referring to defendant as a “cop killer” permissible
• court noted that it did not condone the vengeful language used by the victim-impact witness or her reference to the defendant as a “cop killer”
• factual basis is satisfied by “strong evidence” of guilt and does not require proof “beyond a reasonable doubt”
• use of medication doesn’t render a plea involuntary absent a showing of impaired understanding or decision- 4 STATE v. MURPHY-RICHARDSON Decision of the Court making capacity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).