Skip to main content

State v. Moody

Citations

  • 144 P.3d 612
  • 282 Kan. 181
  • 2006 Kan. LEXIS 650

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting K.S.A. 22-3210 embodies due process requirements articulated in Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 23 L. Ed. 2d 274, 89 S. Ct. 1709 [1969]
  • agreeing with Court of Appeals panel that had disagreed with prior panel opinion
  • defendant challenged BIDS attorney and administrative fees; reversed and remanded without distinguishing between attorney fees and application fee
  • K.S.A. 22-3210 \embodies due process requirements as interpreted by the United States Supreme Court . . . .\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allegrucci, Luckert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.