Supreme Court of Kansas· 4/28/2006

State v. Robinson

Citations

281 Kan. 538
132 P.3d 934
2006 Kan. LEXIS 212

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

discussing order to pay BIDS attorney fees and stating “the assessment itself is not punitive; it is not a punishment or part of the sentence at all”
imposing requirement that findings regarding indigent defendant’s ability to pay BIDS attorney fees be placed on the record despite absence of specific statutory mandate
reviewing unpreserved BIDS fees claim as a question of law arising on proven or admitted facts and that was finally determinative of the case
reaching the issue because it involved only a question of law on proved or admitted facts that determined the case
sentencing court's failure to assess validity of BIDS fees did not violate due process
addressing a BIDS fee challenge for the first time on appeal because the issue involves a question of law on admitted facts and is finally determinative of the case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beier, Luckert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

92 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.