Skip to main content

State v. Jackson

Citations

  • 936 P.2d 761
  • 262 Kan. 119
  • 1997 Kan. LEXIS 62

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no error in denial of venue change where 89.7 percent of respondents recalled the case and 60 percent had formed opinion of guilt
  • district court’s silence at sentencing hearing mandated that sentences be served concurrently despite subsequent journal entry indicating they should be served consecutively
  • “The sentence . . . was effective when pronounced. Because die record of the sentencing hearing is silent as to whether the sentence should run concurrently or consecutively, the sentence must be served concurrent with the other sentences.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lockett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.