Supreme Court of Kansas· 10/21/2011

State v. Inkelaar

Citations

264 P.3d 81
293 Kan. 414
2011 Kan. LEXIS 481

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

discussing hallmarks of gross and flagrant conduct, conduct motivated by ill will
ill will demonstrated by deliberate conduct, repeated improper statements, or apparent indifference to a court’s ruling
A district court’s decision under die third-party evidence rule is subject to an abuse of discretion standard of review on appeal.
“[I]n this case, none of the evidence proffered by the defense connected [the third party] to the charged crimes.”
if the presented evidence meets the test for admission under K.S.A. 2010 Supp. 60-455[a], “ ‘dren the trial court must give a limiting instruction “informing the jury of the specific purpose for [the evidence’s] admission.” ’ ”
misconduct is \gross and flagrant\ if it was repeated or emphasized; deliberate and repeated misconduct or indifference to a court ruling constitutes \ill will\; and evidence is so \direct and overwhelming\ if there is no reasonable possibility that the misconduct affected the verdict

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, Luckert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

61 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.