· 12/4/2009
State v. Ellmaker
Citations
- 221 P.3d 1105
- 289 Kan. 1132
- 2009 Kan. LEXIS 1186
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying clear error analysis when party objects to instruction on one ground at trial but separate ground on appeal
- “[T]he purpose of requiring an objection is to allow the district court to correct an error, if one occurred.”
- where multiple errors have not been found, cumulative error doctrine is inapplicable
- same challenged language in jury instruction was erroneous, but not clearly erroneous
- same challenged language in jury instruction was erroneous, but not clearly erroneous
- discussing standard of review for issues of jurisdiction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Luckert
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.