Skip to main content
· 12/4/2009

State v. Ellmaker

Citations

  • 221 P.3d 1105
  • 289 Kan. 1132
  • 2009 Kan. LEXIS 1186

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying clear error analysis when party objects to instruction on one ground at trial but separate ground on appeal
  • “[T]he purpose of requiring an objection is to allow the district court to correct an error, if one occurred.”
  • where multiple errors have not been found, cumulative error doctrine is inapplicable
  • same challenged language in jury instruction was erroneous, but not clearly erroneous
  • same challenged language in jury instruction was erroneous, but not clearly erroneous
  • discussing standard of review for issues of jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Luckert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.