Skip to main content

State v. Duke

Citations

  • 946 P.2d 1375
  • 263 Kan. 193
  • 1997 Kan. LEXIS 153

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming denial of motion to correct illegal sentence filed “[a]pproximately 1 year after his direct appeal was decided
  • upholding summary dismissal of motion to correct illegal sentence, based on K.S.A. 60-1507 provision imposing duty on a district court to conduct a preliminary examination to determine if motion raises substantial issues of law or fact
  • preliminary treatment of motion to correct illegal sentence intended to be the same as a K.S.A. 60- 1507 motion
  • motion to correct illegal sentence is handled procedurally as a 60-1507 motion
  • motion to correct illegal sentence is handled procedurally as a 60-1507 motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McFarland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.