Supreme Court of Kansas· 7/15/2016

State v. Dunn

Citations

304 Kan. 773
375 P.3d 332
2016 Kan. LEXIS 323

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that if factual allegations in the complaint, proved beyond a reasonable doubt, would justify a guilty verdict, then the charging document is statutorily sufficient
holding a charging document is deemed sufficient if it is \'drawn in the language of the statute'\
finding that the existence of subject matter jurisdiction can be challenged at any time
holding the charging document error did not affect the defendant's 30 substantial rights because the defendant and his trial counsel understood exactly what the State sought to prove on the charged crime
\Charging documents do not bestow or confer subject matter jurisdiction on state courts to adjudicate criminal cases; the Kansas Constitution does.\
\Charging documents do not bestow or confer subject matter jurisdiction on state courts to adjudicate criminal cases; the Kansas Constitution does.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, Beier

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

86 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

93 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.