Washington Supreme Court· 7/18/1996

State v. Moen

Citations

129 Wash. 2d 535
919 P.2d 69

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that some cases refer to a sentence imposed in excess of statutory authority as a jurisdictional matter
determining whether the 60-day time limit for entry of a restitution order is waived by the entry of an uncontested order after the 60-day period has passed
determining whether the 60-day time limit for entry of a restitution order is waived by the entry of an uncontested order after the 60-day period has passed
rejecting an identical waiver argument on the ground that the defendant’s protestations adequately apprised the trial court of the issue
following Marley v. Department of Labor & Indus., 125 Wash.2d 533, 886 P.2d 189 (1994) and holding that imposition of restitution beyond the 60-day limitation period is not a jurisdictional defect.
rejecting the argument that the trial court's failure to comply with 60-day time limit on the entry of restitution orders deprived the court of subject matter jurisdiction to enter such an order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Madsen, Talmadge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

99 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.