Washington Supreme Court· 11/18/2004

In Re Hinton

Citations

100 P.3d 801

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that personal restraint petitions vacating felony murder convictions under Andress are not subject to the one year statutory limit
holding that CrR 4.2(a) grants a defendant the right to plead guilty
applying In re Pers. Restraint of Andress, 147 Wn.2d 602, 56 P.3d 981 (2002) retroactively despite legislature’s post-Andress change to the statute at issue because the court’s 2002 construction “determined what the statute had meant since 1976”
A judgment and sentence is invalid on its face when a defendant is convicted of a nonexistent crime.
“[A] judgment and sentence based on conviction of a nonexistent crime entitles one to relief on collateral review.”
a judgment and sentence is invalid on its face when a defendant is convicted of a nonexistent crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Madsen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

71 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named In Re Hinton

19 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.