Marley v. Department of Labor & Industries

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the argument that errors in a decision of the Department of Labor and Industries affected the Department's subject matter jurisdiction, thereby rendering its order void
• \[t]his Court has `consistently held that when an employer ... pays its industrial insurance premiums'\
• \[t]o hold otherwise would deny Nestle the immunity from suit the IIA grants to all employers\
• res judicata unless set aside on appeal or vacated for fraud or something of like nature
• “A court or agency does not lack subject matter jurisdiction solely because it may lack authority to enter a given order.”
• \a court enters a void order only when it lacks personal jurisdiction or subject matter jurisdiction over the claim\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).