Washington Supreme Court· 3/5/2009

State v. Ross

Citations

95 P.3d 1225

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

affirming the sentencing court's application of a statute that was in effect when the defendant committed the offense
affirming the sentencing court's application of a statute that was in effect when the defendant committed the offense
“ ‘A case is moot if a court can no longer provide effective relief.’ ”
case is moot if court can no longer provide meaningful relief
courts will not address a moot issue unless the issue involves matters of continuing and substantial public interest (citing State v. Blilie, 132 Wn.2d 484, 488 n.1, 939 P.2d 691 (1997); Grays Harbor Paper Co. v. Grays Harbor County, 74 Wn.2d 70, 73, 442 P.2d 967 (1968))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bridge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.