Washington Supreme Court· 2/24/1983
State v. Barr
Citations
- 658 P.2d 1247
- 99 Wash. 2d 75
- 1983 Wash. LEXIS 1409
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- partial compensation of victims may be concomitant result of restitution, but primary purpose is rehabilitation and prevention of recidivism; civil action available for civil damage
- partial compensation of victims may be concomitant result of restitution, but primary purpose is rehabilitation and prevention of recidivism; civil action available for civil damage
- Restitution is “primarily a rehabilitative tool;” it “increases the defendant’s self-awareness and sense of control over his/her own life.”
- restitution under RCW 9.95.210, as a condition of probation, may be ordered for the victim’s wife and child
- as condition of probation, restitution to widow and child of victim of negligent homicide
- as condition of probation, restitution to widow and child of victim of negligent homicide
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cunningham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In re the Personal Restraint of GoodwinWashington Supreme Court· 2002-07-25· cited 363×
- State v. DavisonWashington Supreme Court· 1991-05-16· cited 161×
- State v. MoenWashington Supreme Court· 1996-07-18· cited 159×
- State v. KinnemanWashington Supreme Court· 2005-09-08· cited 136×
- State v. EnstoneWashington Supreme Court· 1999-04-15· cited 104×
- State v. HaddockWashington Supreme Court· 2000-07-13· cited 83×
- State v. GrayWashington Supreme Court· 2012-07-19· cited 72×
- State v. MarkCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1984-01-11· cited 63×
- State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1995-08-02· cited 49×
- State v. PhelpsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-09-13· cited 46×
- In Re the Marriage of Blickenstaff & BlickenstaffCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1993-10-19· cited 42×
- In Re GoodwinWashington Supreme Court· 2002-07-25· cited 33×
- State v. EdelmanCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-08-30· cited 21×
- State v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1990-06-12· cited 18×
- State v. SanchezCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-03-31· cited 16×
- State v. RaleighCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1988-01-08· cited 16×
- State v. ForbesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1986-05-21· cited 15×
- State v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1984-01-23· cited 14×
- State v. EwingCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-09-05· cited 14×
- State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-04-17· cited 14×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.