Skip to main content

State v. Martinez

Citations

  • 899 P.2d 1302
  • 78 Wash. App. 870

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing a court’s discretion to admit otherwise inadmissible evidence as the basis of an expert’s opinion, but not as substantive evidence
  • trial court did not abuse its discretion in limiting the scope of expert witness’ testimony
  • rules governing expert testimony were not designed to enable a witness to summarize and reiterate inadmissible hearsay evidence
  • ER 703 not designed to allow witness to summarize and reiterate all manner of inadmissible evidence
  • rules governing ejqoert testimony were not designed to enable a witness to summarize and reiterate inadmissible hearsay evidence
  • trial court did not abuse its discretion in limiting the scope of expert witness' testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fleisher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.