Washington Supreme Court· 8/12/2004

State v. Ross

Citations

152 Wash. 2d 220

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

affirming the sentencing court's application of a statute that was in effect when the defendant committed the offense
affirming the sentencing court's application of a statute that was in effect when the defendant committed the offense
addressing changes to sentencing classifications and offender scores under the Sentencing Reform Act (SRA)
courts will not address a moot issue unless the issue involves matters of continuing and substantial public interest
defendant not permitted to challenge on appeal the inclusion of out-of-state convictions in offender score where defense counsel affirmatively acknowledged to sentencing court the correctness of State's classification
“ ‘A case is moot if a court can no longer provide effective relief.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bridge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

52 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.