Skip to main content
· 12/1/1966

State v. Loux

Citations

  • 420 P.2d 693
  • 69 Wash. 2d 855
  • 1966 Wash. LEXIS 1018

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • this court \has the power and duty to correct the error upon its discovery\ even where the parties not only failed to object but agreed with the sentencing judge
  • this court “has the power and duty to correct the error upon its discovery” even where the parties not only failed to object but agreed with the sentencing judge
  • \[T]his court `has the power and duty to correct the error upon its discovery' even where the parties not only failed to object but agreed with the sentencing judge\
  • “[T]his court “has the power and duty to correct the error upon its discovery even where the parties not only failed to object but agreed with the sentencing judge”
  • appeal of resentencing during which trial court corrected error in earlier sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Soule

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.