State v. Rogovich

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the quality of the three aggra-vators outweighed the quality of the six miti-gators and thus death penalty was appropriate
• holding that quality of three aggravating circumstances outweighed quality of six miti-gators and thus death was appropriate
• holding that the quality of three aggravators outweighed the value of six mitigators and that the death penalty was appropriate
• stating that defendant has right to confront testifying expert witness, but not individuals “whose findings or research merely form the basis for the witness’s testimony”
• upholding capital sentencing under A.R.S. § 13-703(F)(8) for multiple homicides committed over a nine-hour period “during the commission of the offense”
• upholding capital sentencing under A.R.S. § 13-703(F)(8) for multiple homicides committed over a nine-hour period “during the commission of the offense”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).