United States v. Michael D. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that expert testimony interpreting drug traffickers’ “codes[] and jargon” is helpful just as “a trained observer on the baseball diamond might be able to point out the bunt sign among an array of otherwise meaningless scratches and touches by the third base coach”
• vacating and 1 Havis itself involved a Tennessee statute and not the Ohio statute that gave rise to Powell’s previous conviction at issue here. But we have subsequently made clear that Havis’s logic extends to Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.03(A)(1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).