Skip to main content

State v. Spears

Citations

  • 908 P.2d 1062
  • 184 Ariz. 277
  • 207 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3
  • 1996 Ariz. LEXIS 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that convict’s challenge to lethal gas as cruel and unusual punishment had “no merit”
  • recognizing that murder victim’s funeral expenses and related costs “are proper restitutionary items”
  • concluding \'customary and reasonable attorney’s fees incurred to close the victim's estate’ \ constitute economic loss for restitution purposes
  • noting that a shot to the back of the head is “inconsistent with a heat-of-passion murder”
  • finding that inquiry into 21 allegation that the jury discussed the defendant’s failure to testify “may have required an 22 improper inquiry into the mental processes of the jurors”
  • finding no prejudice, in part, because record did not show whether jurors were exposed to extraneous information

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Corcoran, Feldman, Moeller, Zlaket, Martone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

110 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Spears

95 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.