Skip to main content
· 11/13/1967

Mempa v. Rhay

Citations

  • 389 U.S. 128
  • 88 S. Ct. 254
  • 19 L. Ed. 2d 336
  • 1967 U.S. LEXIS 267

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that sentencing is a “critical stage” of the criminal proceedings such that the Sixth Amendment right to counsel attaches
  • holding that a defendant must be afforded an attorney at a revocation of probation hearing
  • recognizing the “critical nature” of sentencing in criminal proceedings such that the right to counsel attaches
  • holding revocation of probation and imposition of sentence to be a critical stage requiring assistance of counsel
  • recognizing right to counsel in all criminal proceedings that affect an accused’s substantive rights, including probation revocation proceedings
  • concluding that a probation revocation hearing is a critical stage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marshall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.