Supreme Court of Minnesota· 7/1/2004

State v. McCoy

Citations

682 N.W.2d 153
2004 Minn. LEXIS 382
2004 WL 1470268

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that relationship evidence is admissible “without requiring that [it] first be established by clear and convincing evidence”
recognizing that balancing test for relationship evidence mirrors that provided in Minn. R. Evid. 403
recognizing that relationship evidence “assist[s] the jury by providing a context with which it could better judge the credibility of the principals in the relationship”
recognizing that relationship evidence “assist[s] the jury by providing a context with which it could better judge the credibility of the principals in the relationship”
recognizing that relationship evidence “assist[s] the jury by providing a context with which it could better judge the credibility of the principals in the relationship”
recognizing that an attorney’s statements and arguments at trial are not evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gilbert, Blatz, Hanson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. McCoy

211 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.