Sharood v. Hatfield

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that \this court has acquiesced in legislative acts prescribing administrative procedures for admission and discipline of attorneys as long as such acts did not usurp the right of the court to make the final decision\
• noting that “this court has acquiesced in legislative acts prescribing administrative procedures for admission and discipline of attorneys as long as such acts did not usurp the right of the court to make the final decision”
• noting that the court has \acquiesced in legislative acts prescribing administrative procedures for admission and discipline of attorneys as long as such acts do not usurp the right of the Court to make the final decision.\
• noting that the court has “acquiesced in legislative acts prescribing administrative procedures for admission and discipline of attorneys as long as such acts do not usurp the right of the Court to make the final decision.”
• cautioning courts to exercise restraint in dispute over “what is a legislative prerogative and what is a judicial function”
• striking down statute requiring attorney fees paid to be diverted into state’s general fund rather than into separate fund for use in administration of bar because statute infringed on judiciary’s “inherent power to regulate the practice of law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).