State v. Meyer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting that appellant’s challenge to the admissibility of relationship evidence “on the ground that it was not needed to strengthen the state’s case”
• noting that the risk of unfair prejudice due to relationship evidence was “significantly lessened” by other evidence concerning the crime
• “Minnesota courts have recognized the inherent probative value of evidence of past acts of violence committed, as here, by the same defendant against the same victim.”
• “Minnesota courts have recognized the inherent probative value of evidence of past acts of violence committed . . . by the same defendant against the same victim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State v. O'MEARA
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2008-08-26· cited 11×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Griller
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-07-30· cited 451×
• State v. Spreigl
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1965-12-17· cited 368×
• State v. Amos
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-03-27· cited 188×
• State v. Ness
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-01-10· cited 107×
• State v. McCoy
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2004-07-01· cited 98×
• State v. Crowsbreast
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2001-07-12· cited 79×
• State v. Bell
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-07-27· cited 45×
• State v. Meldrum
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2006-11-28· cited 13×
• State v. Lee
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-06-20· cited 10×