New Mexico Court of Appeals· 7/9/1993
State v. McCoy
Citations
- 864 P.2d 307
- 116 N.M. 491
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that probationer failed to satisfy the Donaldson test for determining if a probation condition is not reasonably related to the probationer’s rehabilitation and therefore the trial court did not abuse its discretion in imposing random urinalysis as a condition of probation
- stipulating to factual questions without undergoing actual trial is insufficient for addressing sufficiency of the evidence on appeal
- positive drug test alone insufficient to prove knowledge and intent to possess controlled substance
- “guilty plea waived ... challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence”
- Because random drug tests are related to drug use activity which is criminal and because the testing is reasonably related to deterring future criminality, “the results of those drug tests would not be subject to suppression as the fruit of an unreasonable search and seizure.”
- Because random drug tests are related to drug use activity which is criminal and because the testing is reasonably related to deterring future criminality, “the results of those drug tests would not be subject to suppression as the fruit of an unreasonable search and seizure.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flores, Bivins, Pickard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. HodgeNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1994-08-23· cited 135×
- State v. BacaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2004-03-01· cited 50×
- State v. TYWAYNE H.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-01-29· cited 44×
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2005-04-18· cited 25×
- State v. JacksonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1993-07-28· cited 22×
- State Board of Nursing v. BerryMissouri Court of Appeals· 2000-11-28· cited 20×
- State v. WareNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1994-09-27· cited 17×
- State v. MontanoNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2004-06-15· cited 12×
- State v. HillNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1994-05-16· cited 11×
- State v. RickardNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1994-08-15· cited 8×
- State v. MontañoNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2004-06-15· cited 8×
- State v. RickardNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1994-10-20· cited 7×
- State v. BentonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1994-08-18· cited 6×
- State v. JacksonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2009-03-23· cited 3×
Cites
39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1962-06-25· cited 2,369×
- United States v. BroceSupreme Court· 1989-01-23· cited 1,790×
- United States v. Montoya De HernandezSupreme Court· 1985-07-01· cited 982×
- State v. OroscoNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1992-01-07· cited 169×
- State v. DonaldsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1983-05-17· cited 99×
- State v. HornadayWashington Supreme Court· 1986-01-16· cited 96×
- The United States of America v. Eddie BarboaTenth Circuit· 1985-11-29· cited 92×
- Green v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1990-12-03· cited 86×
- State v. FlinchpaughSupreme Court of Kansas· 1983-02-19· cited 78×
- Sundance Mechanical & Utility Corp. v. AtlasNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1990-04-02· cited 68×
- United States v. Ralph Leo FairchildEleventh Circuit· 1986-11-10· cited 56×
- State v. StenzNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-01-04· cited 46×
- State v. GattisNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1986-11-26· cited 43×
- State v. PowersNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-09-25· cited 42×
- State v. LosollaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1972-06-23· cited 40×
- State v. TravarezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1983-01-06· cited 38×
- State v. DeanNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1986-09-09· cited 38×
- State v. BacaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1974-08-28· cited 38×
- State v. GardnerNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1980-08-21· cited 37×
- State v. MaresNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1979-04-05· cited 36×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.