West Virginia Supreme Court· 2/23/1988
State v. McCoy
Citations
- 366 S.E.2d 731
- 179 W. Va. 223
- 1988 W. Va. LEXIS 6
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that Frye does not govern the admissibility of rape trauma syndrome testimony
- stating that Frye does not govern the admissibility of rape trauma syndrome testimony
- allowing expert testimony on rape trauma syndrome in rape prosecutions where the defense is consent and the expert’s testimony is limited to whether the victim's behavior was consistent with the behavior of other sexual assault victims
- “It is well settled in this State, however, that the jury is the sole judge as to the credibility of witnesses.”
- “Expert testimony that helps the jury to understand the evidence or determine a fact in issue is admissible under West Virginia Rule of Evidence 702.”
- admissibility of expert testimony does not necessarily turn on whether expert uses the term RTS
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brotherton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. Edward Charles L.West Virginia Supreme Court· 1990-09-21· cited 2,400×
- State v. AlbericoNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1993-08-30· cited 297×
- People v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals· 1990-02-13· cited 265×
- Wilt v. BurackerWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1994-04-20· cited 130×
- Commonwealth v. MamayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1990-05-15· cited 104×
- State v. WoodallWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1989-07-06· cited 72×
- State v. MacLennanSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-08-18· cited 53×
- State v. DelaneyWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1992-06-01· cited 47×
- State v. ObetaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2011-03-24· cited 45×
- Gilman v. ChoiWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1991-01-25· cited 43×
- Watson v. Inco Alloys International, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court· 2001-03-09· cited 40×
- State v. ArmstrongWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1988-04-22· cited 33×
- People v. DouglasAppellate Court of Illinois· 1989-06-14· cited 30×
- State v. MartinWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2009-11-23· cited 26×
- State of West Virginia v. Nicholas VarlasWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2016-06-16· cited 13×
- State v. WeaverWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1989-06-16· cited 12×
- State v. AlbericoNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1991-09-26· cited 6×
- State v. LockhartWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1997-06-19· cited 4×
- State v. JacksonWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1989-07-13· cited 4×
- Clark v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-05-03
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Frye v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
- People v. BledsoeCalifornia Supreme Court· 1984-06-14· cited 291×
- State v. SaldanaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-08-31· cited 204×
- State v. BlackWashington Supreme Court· 1987-11-05· cited 192×
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri· 1984-01-17· cited 170×
- State v. MarksSupreme Court of Kansas· 1982-07-16· cited 117×
- People v. HamptonSupreme Court of Colorado· 1987-11-30· cited 97×
- State v. BaileyWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1967-07-11· cited 91×
- State v. LiddellMontana Supreme Court· 1984-07-10· cited 75×
- State v. BrodniakMontana Supreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 61×
- State v. HueyArizona Supreme Court· 1985-05-21· cited 46×
- State v. McQuillenSupreme Court of Kansas· 1984-10-26· cited 44×
- Rozas v. RozasWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1986-03-25· cited 27×
- State ex rel. City of Kent v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court· 1920-01-07· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.