Supreme Court of Minnesota· 8/9/1991

State v. Everett

Citations

472 N.W.2d 864
1991 Minn. LEXIS 194
1991 WL 149294

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that prosecutor’s closing- argument comments were not improper when he urged the jury to consider the witness credible based on his demeanor during his testimony
holding that the state’s peremptory challenge of the only African-American prospective juror did not raise an inference of a racially discriminatory motive where the state explained that the juror was stricken because she was too young
holding that the state's peremptory challenge of the only African-American prospective juror did not raise an inference of a racially discriminatory motive where the state explained that the juror was stricken because she was too young
holding un-objected-to comments about the defendant’s demeanor by prosecutor in closing argument were not in the form of personal opinions and did not constitute plain and prejudicial error
stating that our supreme court follows the United States Supreme Court case Scott v. United States, 436 U.S. 128, 98 S. Ct. 1717 (1978
noting the distinction between a violation of a court rule and a violation of the federal constitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coyne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.