Supreme Court of Minnesota· 3/18/2010

State v. Matthews

Citations

779 N.W.2d 543
2010 Minn. LEXIS 110
2010 WL 985764

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

providing that objections to the complaint must be 8 made at least three days before the omnibus hearing or they are waived
stating that error is “plain” if it “violates or contradicts case law, a rule, or an applicable standard of conduct”
stating that we review an unobjected-to error for plain error, but review an error to which an objection was. made under ■ an abuse-of-discretion standard
stating misconduct limited to “a few lines in a 48-page closing argument” did not affect defendant’s substantial rights
exercising discretion to decide a jury instruction issue “related to an unadjudicated jury verdict” because the issue was functionally justiciable and “one of public importance and statewide significance”
noting relationship evidence is relevant because it assists the jury in assessing witness credibility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dietzen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.