Arizona Supreme Court· 11/9/1983

State v. McCall

Citations

677 P.2d 920
139 Ariz. 147

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding testimony “that the witness had no motive to testify falsely” was not improper vouching
explaining that the level of corroboration of the tip in that case may not have satisfied the more rigid test
finding supported in part by the fact that the mutilation of the victims' bodies \was designed to be a `message' to warn other people\
slitting of throat after “execution-style” murders is depraved because it was done to send a “message” to others
holding issue not raised in opening brief is waived on appeal
rejecting argument that eliciting testimony regarding witness’s promise, because of a guilty plea to testify truthfully, amounted to vouching

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gordon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

112 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

84 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. McCall

74 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.