State v. McCall
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 383
Syllabus
App.R. 26(B) application for reopening ineffective assistance of appellate counsel good cause untimely application appellate counsel's discretion to decide which issues to raise and argue ineffective assistance of trial counsel motion to suppress letters. - The application to reopen was denied where the application was filed almost five years from the date of the appellate decision without a showing of good cause for the delayed filing. Even if the application was timely, the claimed instances of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel do not establish a colorable claim of ineffective assistance to warrant reopening.
Judges: Keough
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court· 1983-07-05· cited 7,925×
- State v. ReedOhio Supreme Court· 1996-02-14· cited 335×
- State v. SpiveyOhio Supreme Court· 1998-11-25· cited 313×
- State v. ReddickOhio Supreme Court· 1995-04-26· cited 212×
- State v. GummOhio Supreme Court· 2004-09-22· cited 197×
- State v. AllenOhio Supreme Court· 1996-12-18· cited 116×
- State v. KeithOhio Supreme Court· 2008-08-07· cited 14×
- State v. FarrowOhio Supreme Court· 2007-09-20· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.