Skip to main content

State v. McCall

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 383

Syllabus

App.R. 26(B) application for reopening ineffective assistance of appellate counsel good cause untimely application appellate counsel's discretion to decide which issues to raise and argue ineffective assistance of trial counsel motion to suppress letters. - The application to reopen was denied where the application was filed almost five years from the date of the appellate decision without a showing of good cause for the delayed filing. Even if the application was timely, the claimed instances of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel do not establish a colorable claim of ineffective assistance to warrant reopening.

Judges: Keough

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.