State v. McCall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that reaching through shutters but not the window within was not “entry”
• holding that reaching through shutters but not the window within was not 3 “entry”
• holding that reaching through shutters but not the window within was not “entry”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ferguson v. Georgia
  Supreme Court· 1961-03-27· cited 363×
• State v. Pigques
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1958-03-10· cited 84×
• People v. Valencia
  California Supreme Court· 2002-06-03· cited 63×
• Commonwealth v. Stewart
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1926-02-25· cited 31×
• State v. Liberty
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1971-08-20· cited 26×
• Robinson v. State
  Alabama Court of Appeals· 1969-06-30· cited 22×
• Minter v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1903-01-10· cited 13×
• Miller v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1966-05-17· cited 10×
• Lowman v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1981-03-31· cited 9×
• State v. Grubaugh
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1950-08-31· cited 8×
• Marshall v. Wheeler
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1925-04-23· cited 7×
• State v. Holt
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2015-06-19· cited 7×
• People v. Beauchamp
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2009-03-09· cited 5×
• State v. Holt
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2015-04-27
• State v. Logan
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1980-02-04