Arizona Supreme Court· 2/2/1989
State v. Walton
Citations
- 769 P.2d 1017
- 159 Ariz. 571
- 27 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 21
- 1989 Ariz. LEXIS 20
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that statements such as “[i]t’s nothing that can’t be worked out” and “to lie isn’t going to help” were the detective’s opinions and not an express or implied promise
- “[T]he purpose of the killing must be to further the defendant’s motive of pecuniary gain.... ”
- \[T]he purpose of the killing must be to further the defendant's motive of pecuniary gain....\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holohan, Feldman, Moeller, Gordon, Cameron
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
102 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lewis v. JeffersSupreme Court· 1990-08-30· cited 1,972×
- Walton v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1990-08-30· cited 1,614×
- People v. CoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court· 2004-10-27· cited 855×
- State v. BibleArizona Supreme Court· 1993-08-12· cited 658×
- State v. BassArizona Supreme Court· 2000-11-09· cited 586×
- Arave v. CreechSupreme Court· 1993-03-30· cited 361×
- State v. AtwoodArizona Supreme Court· 1992-07-10· cited 361×
- Kansas v. MarshSupreme Court· 2006-06-26· cited 332×
- State v. BoltonArizona Supreme Court· 1995-06-13· cited 326×
- State v. Amaya-RuizArizona Supreme Court· 1990-12-14· cited 276×
- State v. MurrayArizona Supreme Court· 1995-10-26· cited 217×
- State v. SalazarArizona Supreme Court· 1992-12-17· cited 207×
- State v. LaversArizona Supreme Court· 1991-07-23· cited 189×
- State v. TrostleArizona Supreme Court· 1997-12-24· cited 187×
- State v. Soto-FongArizona Supreme Court· 1996-11-19· cited 182×
- State v. HoskinsArizona Supreme Court· 2000-12-29· cited 180×
- Ritchie v. KrasnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-04-21· cited 173×
- State v. RienhardtArizona Supreme Court· 1997-12-24· cited 164×
- State v. GallegosArizona Supreme Court· 1994-03-15· cited 158×
- James McKinney v. Charles RyanNinth Circuit· 2015-12-29· cited 154×
Cites
99 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 7,191×
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court· 1978-07-03· cited 5,026×
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 3,675×
- Michel v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1956-01-23· cited 2,788×
- Enmund v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1982-07-02· cited 2,349×
- McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1986-06-19· cited 1,908×
- Tison v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1987-04-21· cited 1,617×
- Murphy v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1975-06-16· cited 1,568×
- Booth v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1987-09-21· cited 1,501×
- Haynes v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1963-05-27· cited 1,403×
- Bram v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1897-12-13· cited 1,397×
- State v. LeonArizona Supreme Court· 1969-03-14· cited 1,311×
- Affronti v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1955-12-05· cited 1,308×
- Davis v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 986×
- Arizona v. RumseySupreme Court· 1984-05-29· cited 589×
- Cabana v. BullockSupreme Court· 1986-01-22· cited 536×
- Fikes v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1957-01-14· cited 507×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.