Supreme Court of Florida· 12/12/2002
State v. Lewis
Citations
- 838 So. 2d 1102
- 2002 WL 31769281
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that \the obligation to investigate and prepare for the penalty portion of a capital case cannot be overstated\
- requiring a new penalty phase where trial counsel failed to investigate mitigation evidence prior to trial, resulting in his client waiving the presentation of mitigation altogether
- \[T]he obligation to investigate and prepare for the penalty portion of a capital case cannot be overstated this is an integral part of a capital case.\
- “[T]he obligation to investigate and prepare for the penalty portion of a capital case cannot be overstated—this is an integral part of a capital case.”
- “[T]he obligation to investigate and prepare for the penalty portion of a capital case cannot be overstated—this is an integral part of a capital case.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. HandOhio Supreme Court· 2006-01-18· cited 252×
- Sochor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2004-07-08· cited 228×
- Coday v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-10-26· cited 94×
- Hodges v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2004-10-14· cited 82×
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2005-10-20· cited 69×
- Ferrell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2010-01-14· cited 64×
- Mungin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-04-06· cited 64×
- Lynch v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2009-01-30· cited 62×
- Mordenti v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2004-12-16· cited 54×
- Rhodes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2008-07-03· cited 53×
- Hannon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-08-31· cited 52×
- Windom v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2004-05-06· cited 52×
- Jennings v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2013-06-27· cited 51×
- Lott v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-04-13· cited 47×
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2004-12-02· cited 40×
- Bell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2007-06-07· cited 37×
- Orme v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2005-02-24· cited 37×
- Gonzalez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2008-07-03· cited 36×
- Power v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2004-05-06· cited 34×
- Grim v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2007-10-04· cited 33×
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court· 1999-06-17· cited 4,383×
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court· 1987-02-24· cited 2,521×
- Huff v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-07-01· cited 322×
- Rutherford v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-10-12· cited 256×
- Omar Blanco, Cross-Appellant v. Harry K. Singletary, as Secretary, Department of Corrections, State of Florida, Cross-AppelleeEleventh Circuit· 1991-09-30· cited 193×
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1991-01-18· cited 152×
- Way v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-04-20· cited 143×
- Rose v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1996-03-07· cited 121×
- Heath v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1994-10-20· cited 104×
- Koon v. DuggerSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-03-25· cited 104×
- Bruno v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2001-12-06· cited 103×
- Harris v. DuggerEleventh Circuit· 1989-05-16· cited 95×
- Downs v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida· 2001-09-26· cited 69×
- Valle v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2001-01-18· cited 36×
- Henry v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1992-12-24· cited 35×
- Deaton v. DuggerSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-10-07· cited 24×
- Nelms v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1992-03-12· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.