Skip to main content

Mordenti v. State

Citations

  • 894 So. 2d 161
  • 2004 WL 2922134

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding prejudice when the undisclosed evidence refuted a critical issue at trial and the witness impeached by the evidence was the only one who was able to testify to this issue
  • “[w]hether evidence is ‘material’ for Brady purposes is a mixed question of law and fact subject to independent review”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Mordenti v. State

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.