Skip to main content

Heath v. State

Citations

  • 648 So. 2d 660
  • 1994 WL 570659

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a \trial court has broad discretion in determining the relevance of evidence and such determination will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion\
  • noting that a \trial court has broad discretion in determining the relevance of evidence and such determination will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion\
  • affirming death sentence for shooting death of victim where aggravators included commission during a robbery, and prior murder
  • affirming defendant's death sentence based on the presence of two aggravators—prior violent felony and murder committed during the course of a robbery—despite the existence of the statutory mitigator, extreme mental or emotional disturbance
  • affirming defendant's death sentence based on presence of two aggravating factors of prior violent felony and murder committed during course of robbery, despite the existence of the statutory mitigator of extreme mental or emotional disturbance
  • “The trial court has broad discretion in determining the relevance of 9 evidence and such determination will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

88 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.