Arizona Supreme Court· 4/2/1992

State v. Lara

Citations

830 P.2d 803
171 Ariz. 282
109 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 26
1992 Ariz. LEXIS 28

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

vacating, because of “healthy respect for stare decisis,” court of appeals’ holding that essential and irreducible element of crime cannot serve to aggravate crime it defines
restating the holding of a previous case despite the fact that if the Court had been \writing on a clean slate\ it might have taken another approach
restating the holding of a previous case despite the fact that if the Court had been “writing on a clean slate” it might have taken another approach
restating the holding of a previous case despite the fact that if the Court had been “writing on a clean slate” it might have taken another approach
'“serious physical injury’ ” necessarily, though not literally, includes death
“‘serious physical injury’” necessarily, though not literally, includes death

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moeller, Feldman, Corcoran, Myers, Cameron, Moeller'S, Feldman'S, Arizona, County

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.