State v. Sexton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a recent court of appeals case applying Wasko in a criminal case
• a recent court of appeals case applying Wasko in a criminal case
• adhering to traditional state rule of automatic prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Lavers
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1991-07-23· cited 189×
• State v. Hill
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1993-01-14· cited 111×
• State v. Comer
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1990-07-31· cited 104×
• State v. Jonas
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2017-12-01· cited 58×
• State v. George
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-11-26· cited 49×
• State v. Huerta
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1993-06-24· cited 47×
• State v. Lara
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1992-04-02· cited 40×
• State v. Ramos
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1991-04-08· cited 26×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-04-11· cited 14×
• State v. Hummer
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-10-31· cited 13×
• State v. Ibanez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-09-18· cited 9×
• State v. Perez Lara
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-07-01· cited 6×
• State v. Bingham
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-09-23· cited 6×
• State v. Huerta
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-04-07· cited 5×
• State v. Shone
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-09-23· cited 4×
• State of Arizona v. Christina Marie George
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-11-26