Arizona Supreme Court· 8/26/1997

State v. Lee

Citations

944 P.2d 1222
189 Ariz. 608
250 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 34
1997 Ariz. LEXIS 98

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that, because the trial court is in the best position to determine the effect of a prosecutor’s comments on the jury, we will not disturb the trial court’s ruling absent an abuse of discretion
rejecting the \argument that finding pecuniary gain as an aggravating circumstance is unconstitutional where it repeats an element\ of armed robbery
noting testimony did not use inflammatory language when weighing testimony’s prejudicial value
when defendant objects to use of restraint during trial, record should support trial court’s decision
“Trial judges ‘are presumed to know the law and to apply it in making their decisions.’”
appellate courts do not reweigh the evidence on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Zlaket, Feldman, Moeller, Martone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.