State v. Rybolt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court’s recognition of witness’s in-court identification did not constitute a statement of opinion on the evidence, but simply established for the record a fact that had occurred at trial
• claim not raised at trial that jury instructions impermissibly amended an indictment reviewed for fundamental error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).