State v. Magana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that language in the indictment implicitly supported a lesser- included instruction
• “Although the indictment does not refer to the use of a specific deadly weapon or dangerous instrument in the commission of the crime, it does refer to Highway 95 near milepost 240.9 as the location where the crime was committed.”
• “Although the indictment does not refer to the use of a specific deadly weapon or dangerous instrument in the commission of the crime, it does refer to Highway 95 near milepost 240.9 as the location where the crime was committed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Robles
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2006-05-25· cited 52×
• State v. Sucharew
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-04-11· cited 42×
• State v. Corona
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-02-11· cited 27×
• State of Arizona v. James Albert Robles
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2006-05-25
• State of Arizona v. Justin Alexander Copeland
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2022-04-01

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Bly
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1980-11-18· cited 107×
• State v. Lara
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1992-04-02· cited 40×
• State v. Gooch
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1984-03-01· cited 28×
• State v. Orduno
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1989-01-10· cited 23×
• State v. Caudillo
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1979-11-27· cited 23×
• State v. Olsen
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1988-04-21· cited 17×
• State v. Teran
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-07-15· cited 17×
• State v. Self
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-02-03· cited 16×