Court of Appeals of Arizona· 10/5/1989

State v. Howard

Citations

785 P.2d 1235
163 Ariz. 47
44 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 47
1989 Ariz. App. LEXIS 265

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“officer’s indication that he wanted a blood sample prior to the [hospital] technician’s drawing the blood does not alter the fact of its being taken for medical purposes”
\officer's indication that he wanted a blood sample prior to the [hospital] technician's drawing the blood does not alter the fact of its being taken for medical purposes\
“officer’s indication that he wanted a blood sample prior to the [hospital] technician’s drawing the blood does not alter 7 the fact of its being taken for medical purposes”
defendant rear-ended car in which victim was riding
explaining “restitution is to make the victim whole”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hathaway, Roll, Howard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.